General Grabber Arctic Winter Tires Review
General Grabber Arctic Studdable All-Terrain Snow Tires Review For the 5th Gen 4Runner
The 5th Gen 4Runner is one of the most capable oﬀ-the-lot 4x4s available today—so why would it need a winter tire?
I will begin with the admission that this is my ﬁrst foray into the world of winter tires.
In the past, I chose all-terrain tires such as the BFGoodrich KO2 for all conditions in all seasons. As a recent transplant to the road system of interior Alaska, however, I must also admit to being a convert to the winter tire school of thought for driving in the coldest, darkest months of the year.
Find It Online:
Why I Bought Winter Tires
The ﬁrst addition made to my recently purchased 2013 Trail Edition 4Runner was a set of KO2s in the stock size of 265/70/17.
Past experience with these tires on a Jeep Liberty that I kept in the Anchorage area informed this purchase. Based on that experience and research, I believed that these tires would do an excellent job on the winter roads in the Fairbanks area. They proved to be adequate in this regard.
The ﬁrst chink in the armor did not take long to appear.
On the AlCan between Tetlin Junction and Whitehorse last October, I ran into an early winter storm. Snow depth on the road ranged from 1-3 feet in unplowed sections of the road. In 4wd at moderate speed, I made it through without incident, though the 4Runner exhibited a constant tendency to wobble at the rear wheels.
Not far outside of Tetlin, the driver of a Kia sedan equipped with snow tires passed me at highway speed. He kept this up until hitting a drift at the vehicle’s hood line, at which point he turned around and headed back the other way. The lesson I took from this-unless ground clearance is an issue, winter tires can provide better traction than 4wd or AWD on non-winter tires.
Is the KO2 Deserving of a 3pmsf Rating?
In town, I found the KO2s to be just good enough for most day to day driving, although 4wd proved to be a necessity at nearly every stoplight to keep the rear of the vehicle from trying to pass the front.
The tires struggled to gain traction under modest acceleration on the icy surfaces common at intersections. While I disliked the wear and tear and reduced gas mileage from using 4wd on paved roads, I ﬁgured I could live with it as opposed to buying new tires just a few weeks after buying the KO2s.
A couple of weeks later, en route to Anchorage on the Parks Highway, I ran into deep snow mixed with ice in the early morning hours.
Everything was ﬁne until I crossed a bridge into the town of Healy. At low speed and in 4wd, the KO2s lost their grip on an ice patch and the 4Runner spun into the oncoming lane, mercifully avoiding oncoming traﬃc and halting prior to the ditch on the opposite side of the road.
After this incident, I began to look seriously at winter tire options.
How Winter Tires Work
A lot of science and engineering goes into tire design, much of which I must admit I do not fully understand. According to my research, the key features shared by most winter tires are a tread design with close voids, generous siping along the tread blocks, and a softer than normal compound used in construction. The close voids grip and hold snow, which in turn provides surface traction as it contacts snow and ice on the road’s surface. The siping and soft compound also provides additional grip in myriad winter road conditions.
In contrast, heavy-duty all-terrain tires like the KO2 are made of harder compounds to resist off-road damage.
They will wear longer and provide traction on a wider variety of surfaces than winter tires, but cannot match the traction of winter tires in icy conditions.
Most snow rated tires like the KO2 will be branded with the three-peak mountain snowflake (3PMSF) symbol indicating they meet the industry’s severe snow service requirements. But, just because they are branded as such, doesn’t mean they can really hold up under extreme snow and ice in Alaska.
You can read more details about buying tires on the tire buying guide on Trail 4Runner.
Why I chose the General Grabber Arctic
As I previously mentioned, this would be my ﬁrst set of winter tires.
I needed to do some research, so I asked around and read a lot of forum posts and tire buying guide on Trail4R. Most advice pointed to the Bridgestone Blizzak or Nokian Haakapaleitta, the two established kings of the winter tire world. So I looked into those options ﬁrst.
The Nokians were beyond the reach of my rather limited budget, while I would have been placed on a waiting list to get Blizzaks in the 265/70/17 size. The estimated wait time was three weeks.
I then looked at other well-reviewed options from Cooper and Toyo. I almost pulled the trigger on a set of Toyo Observe tires at a price just above my comfort level when I received a promotional; buy three, get one free tire oﬀer from Toyota.
This provided a great way to get the winter tires I needed at a price point within my budget. One problem–the promotion limited choices to the General Grabber Arctic, the Firestone Winterforce 2, and the Michelin X-Ice.
The Michelin was still on the high side of my budget, while the other two were virtually identical in cost at a much lower price point (roughly half of the quoted price for the Nokians).
The Grabber, however, oﬀered deeper tread and had more favorable feedback than the Firestone oﬀering. Within a week, I had a set of General Grabber Arctics installed on my 4Runner.
Check prices on these winter tires:
- Bridgestone Blizzak
- Nokian Haakapaleitta
- Toyo Observe
- Cooper Evolution Winter
- Firestone Winterforce 2
- Michelin X-Ice
- General Grabber Arctics
General Grabber Arctic Features
The Arctic wears the four mountain peaks/dual snowﬂake logo, indicating that it meets the industry standard for severe winter weather use. Other prominent features include (from General Tire’s website):
- Wear-Resistant Design: Made from Duragen, a “robust a cut- and chip-resistant compound that maintains its ﬂexibility in freezing temperatures.”
- Interlocking Siping Pattern: “Reduces squirm and block deformation” and oﬀers “exceptional grip in snow, ice and wet conditions.”
- Symmetric Tread Design: “Improve handling and braking in all conditions.”
- Studdable: The Arctic comes with pinholes for adding 11mm studs for traction on icy surfaces.
- Made in the USA
I must admit to feeling a bit chagrined as I backed out of my parking spot at the dealership with my brand new winter tires struggling to gain traction on the hard-packed snow. I also disliked the minivan tire proﬁle reminiscent of the stock Dunlop GrandTreks, in contrast to the blocky, macho KO2s.
However, the Arctics found some bite and I made it home without incident—and without the need for 4wd.
In the days that followed, I grew more impressed with the Arctic’s composure in a variety of road conditions. They go about their job in a quiet, drama-free way that has deﬁnitely helped my conﬁdence with winter driving.
Most of the miles accrued during the test period occurred on my daily commute. This is a roughly 25-mile round trip of suburban roads and highway driving, with posted speed limits of 40-55 mph. There are several notable curves and elevation changes in the route.
The test period also includes multiple roundtrips between Fairbanks and Anchorage. This roughly 345-mile stretch includes multiple mountain passes and a wide variety in the level of winter road maintenance.
Weather conditions predictably varied from clear to modest to severe to why-on-earth-am-I-driving-in-this.
Where the Arctics Struggle
The General Grabber Arctics consistently struggle on ice-glazed hard-packed snow, the type typically found at intersections and turn lanes.
Much like the KO2s, the Arctics flail a bit under modest acceleration. This is perhaps exacerbated by the dead zone at the top of the 4Runner’s gas pedal. Typically, this causes the traction control to kick in. Using 4wd in these situations allows for a smoother, more drama-free driving experience.
Adding studs would likely also help in this scenario, and they are a studdable tire when that time comes.
Long term positives
I have put roughly 3,500 miles on my set of Arctics, and they have consistently reliable in foul weather conditions. If traction is lost, I have found recovery to be much quicker and more controllable than the previous KO2s.
Under most winter driving conditions, they have provided quiet, conﬁdent traction at a variety of speeds. Braking, even under duress, has been consistently poised and controlled.
Perhaps the biggest endorsement I can give them is that I have rarely needed 4wd on the road since I bought them. The tires have thus far exhibited minimal, even tread wear.
Are they for you?
If you are looking for improved winter traction at a favorable price, the General Grabber Arctic may be a good ﬁt for you. Bear in mind, though, that it is not an all-terrain tire, and not suitable for extended or extreme oﬀ-road use.
Comments or Questions? Leave them below!